There will be parades all across the country this Memorial Day commemorating our U.S. service members who died while serving the country. But not all service members will be honored for their acts of service, bravery, and patriotism.
Back in the day, LGBTQ+ service members who died in service were either closeted about their sexual orientation and gender identities or were discharged under “Fraudulent Enlistment.”
Related
Military ordered to identify troops with “symptoms consistent with gender dysphoria” to kick out
The service branches were told to get ready to start kicking trans people out in June.
Unfortunately, today, not much has changed. If Donald Trump had his way, he would militarily eradicate transgender people from existence. Sadly, on May 6, SCOTUS upheld Trump’s ban on transgender individuals enlisting in the military. The ban also allows for the discharge of current transgender service members, and on May 15, the Pentagon began mass removal of its transgender troops.
Dive deeper every day
Join our newsletter for thought-provoking commentary that goes beyond the surface of LGBTQ+ issues
Subscribe to our Newsletter today
In 2017, Trump delivered his ban on transgender service members in his inimitable style of communicating to the American public: in the form of a tweet.
“After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military,” he wrote. “Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender individuals in the military would entail. Thank you.”
Ironically, Trump’s tweet came on the 69th anniversary of President Harry Truman’s 1948 executive order desegregating the U. S. military – and from a Vietnam draft dodger who received five deferments, one of which was a medical diagnosis for bone spurs in his heels.
Trump’s ban primarily focuses on gender dysphoria and gender-affirming surgery as disqualifying conditions, in part because of the alleged high costs associated with trans health care. But evidence has shown that the military spends eight times more money on erectile dysfunction medications like Viagra and Cialis than it does on providing medical services for transgender troops; the bias persists nonetheless.
The president’s binary views of gender and the perceived excessive cost of gender-affirming surgery give rise to his notion that transgender healthcare is a “tremendous” cost and “disruption” to the military.
The privacy rationale is another argument used to advocate for banning LGBTQ+ service members from combat. This argument states that all service members have the right to maintain at least partial control over the exposure of their bodies and intimate bodily functions. In other words, heterosexual men deserve the right to control who sees their naked bodies. According to the privacy rationale argument, the “homosexual gaze” does more than disrupt unit cohesion. Its supposedly predatory nature expresses sexual yearning and desires for unwilling subjects that not only violates the civil rights of heterosexuals, but also causes untoward psychological and emotional trauma.
While it is believed that the “homosexual gaze” would be the root cause of the disruption of unit cohesion and military capability of our service members, it is actually the macho male heterosexual culture embedded in this milieu. It is in this culture that both sexual harassment and assault of female and LGBTQ+ service members persist.
However, the 2002 study titled “A Modest Proposal: Privacy as a Flawed Rationale for the Exclusion of Gays and Lesbians from the U.S. Military,” stated that banning LGBTQ+ service members would not preserve the privacy of its heterosexual service members, but instead it would actually undermine heterosexual privacy because of its systematic invasion to maintain it. In order to maintain heterosexual privacy, military inspectors would not only inquire about the sexual behaviors of their service members, but they would also inquire into the sexual behaviors of the spouses, partners, friends, and relatives of their service members.
Military readiness is not a heterosexual cisgender calling. But the military’s belief that service members who are transgender endanger “unit cohesion” only maintains a policy of segregation and fosters a climate of transphobia. It also maintains the military’s history of intolerance, as its argument is eerily reminiscent of the ones used when the military did not want to integrate its ranks racially.
Our transgender service members are prepared to defend this country with their lives. Like racism and sexism, in our armed forces, transphobia is militarily dangerous because it thwarts the necessary emotional bonding needed amongst service members in battle, and it underutilizes the needed human resources to make a democratic and robust military.
Memorial Day was founded by newly freed African Americans in South Carolina on May 1, 1865, just two weeks after the end of the Civil War. They established the day to remember and honor the Union’s fallen soldiers. This Memorial Day, let’s remember our unsung transgender service members who have fallen in previous wars and are in the midst of fighting Trump’s current war against them.
Subscribe to the LGBTQ Nation newsletter and be the first to know about the latest headlines shaping LGBTQ+ communities worldwide.